Ex Parte Basceri et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2005-2351                                                        
          Application No. 09/904,112                                                  

          non-elected invention (claims 7, 13, 14, 16-21, 31-36, 51-56, 64-           
          72, 80-99 and 106; Brief, page 2).  We have jurisdiction pursuant           
          to 35 U.S.C. § 134.                                                         
               According to appellants, the invention is directed to a                
          method of making stabilized capacitors and DRAM (Dynamic Random             
          Access Memory) cells (Brief, page 2).  Further details of the               
          present invention may be understood from representative                     
          independent claim 1, as reproduced below:                                   
               1. A method of forming a capacitor comprising providing a              
          conductive oxide electrode, depositing a first layer of a high              
          dielectric constant oxide dielectric material on said conductive            
          oxide electrode, oxidizing said conductive oxide electrode and              
          said first layer of said high dielectric constant oxide                     
          dielectric material under oxidizing condition such that at least            
          the surface of said conductive oxide electrode is provided with             
          enough oxygen to provide stability with said first layer of high            
          dielectric constant oxide dielectric material, depositing a                 
          second layer of said high dielectric constant oxide dielectric              
          material on said first layer of said high dielectric constant               
          oxide dielectric material, and depositing an upper layer                    
          electrode on said second layer of said high dielectric constant             
          oxide dielectric material.                                                  
               Appellants state that the claims do not stand or fall                  
          together (Brief, page 4).  Accordingly, to the extent appellants            
          present reasonably specific, substantive reasons for the separate           
          patentability of individual claims, we consider these claims                
          separately.  See 37 CFR § 1.192(c)(7)(2003); In re McDaniel, 293            
          F.3d 1379, 1383, 63 USPQ2d 1462, 1465 (Fed. Cir. 2002).                     
                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007