Ex Parte BUSCHE et al - Page 10



            Appeal No. 2005-1644                                                                       
            Application 09/400,583                                                                     
            the store and, as noted in the new ground of rejection, we find                            
            that determining the relative placement of products using data                             
            mining techniques lacks written description support and is                                 
            misdescriptive of the described invention.                                                 
                  The examiner finds (FR2):                                                            
                  Hughes et al. teach[] associating spatial relationships with                         
                  customer data to determine additional information concerning                         
                  purchases by the customer ..., recording (identifying) paths                         
                  of customers ..., associating the locations of products with                         
                  the paths of customers as claimed ... which employs data                             
                  mining algorithms to generate input data for forming the set                         
                  of spatial relationships (see at least col. 17, lines 5-20,                          
                  30-45, col. 20, lines 10-15, 25-60) and spatial analysis                             
                  algorithms to form the set of spatial relationships (see at                          
                  least col. 20, lines 40-50, col. 19, lines 1-35, col. 13,                            
                  lines 25-45, col. 18, lines 15-40).                                                  
                  Appellants argue that the data mining of Hughes is not                               
            described as generating spatial relationships, but is only                                 
            described as used for measuring overall facility performance.                              
            For example, appellants argue (Br5):                                                       
                  The data mining of Hughes is not described or applied to                             
                  generating spatial relationships using data mining                                   
                  techniques where the spatial relationships include                                   
                  associations of customer paths through retail space with                             
                  product placement.  In order to apply the teachings of data                          
                  mining from Tough [sic, Toung] to Hughes, Hughes must be                             
                  modified by applying the use of data mining to generating                            
                  spatial relationships using data mining techniques where the                         
                  spatial relationships include associations of customer paths                         
                  through the retail space with product placement.  No such                            
                  teaching is found in either reference.                                               
            And, appellants further argue (Br6):                                                       
                        In addition, Hughes teaches using data mining for                              
                  measuring overall facility performance.  Hughes does not                             
                  teach using data mining to generate spatial relationships                            
                  where the spatial relationships include relative placement                           
                                               - 10 -                                                  




Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007