Ex Parte BUSCHE et al - Page 3



            Appeal No. 2005-1644                                                                       
            Application 09/400,583                                                                     
                        wherein the spatial relationships further include                              
                  associations of customer paths through the retail space with                         
                  product placement within the retail space.                                           
                                           THE REFERENCES                                              
                  The examiner relies on the following references:                                     
                  Hughes et al. (Hughes)    5,920,261        July 6, 1999                              
                  Toung, Creating A More Productive Retail Machine, Wal-Mart                           
                  Stores, Inc. - Company Report, December 1997.                                        
                  THE DATA GAME: Sophisticated marketing wizards can track                             
                  just about everything a consumer does (corporate data-                               
                  mining), Maclean's, v. 111, n. 16, p. 14 (August 1998)                               
                  (hereinafter the "Data Game").                                                       
                                           THE REJECTION                                               
                  Claims 39, 41-44, 53, and 55-58 stand rejected under                                 
            35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Hughes, Toung, and                           
            the Data Game.                                                                             
                  We refer to the final rejection (pages referred to as                                
            "FR__") and the examiner's answer (pages referred to as "EA__")                            
            for a statement of the examiner's rejection, and to the brief                              
            (pages referred to as "Br__") for a statement of appellants'                               
            arguments thereagainst.  Familiarity with the rejection and the                            
            arguments is presumed in the discussion below.                                             

                                             DISCUSSION                                                
            New ground of rejection under 37 CFR § 41.50(b)                                            


                                                - 3 -                                                  




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007