Ex Parte Post - Page 4




               Appeal No. 2005-2042                                                                        Page 4                  
               Application No. 09/946,298                                                                                          



                       Claim 11 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over U.S. Patent                               
               No. 6,111,332 ("Post"); U.S. Patent No. 3,176,206 ("Lund"); and U.S. Patent                                         
               No. 5,155,402 ("Bichler").  Claim 12 stand rejected under § 103(a) as obvious over                                  
               Post; Lund; Bichler; and U.S. Patent No. 6,353,273 ("Heshmat").                                                     


                                                          II. OPINION                                                              
                       Our opinion addresses the claims in the following order:                                                    
                       •      claim 11                                                                                             
                       •      claim 12.                                                                                            
                                                          A. CLAIM 11                                                              
                       Rather than reiterate the positions of the examiner or the appellant in toto, we                            
               focus on the following points of contention therebetween:                                                           
                       -      teachings of the references                                                                          
                       -      motivation to combine the teachings.                                                                 

                                               1. Teachings of the References                                                      
                       The examiner makes the following detailed findings.                                                         
                       (a) Appellant's claim 11 reads as following:                                                                
                       "An apparatus for restoring a rotor to an equilibrium position. . . .''  Post                               
                       (6,111,332) discloses having a rotor 10, which uses windings and Halbach                                    
                       magnets for restoring the rotor to an equilibrium position (column 4,                                       
                       lines 56-59).                                                                                               
                       (b) The claim further reads, "the stator including conductive loops and lap                                 
                       windings, wherein the lap windings are interleaved with said conductive                                     







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007