Ex Parte Post - Page 12




               Appeal No. 2005-2042                                                                       Page 12                  
               Application No. 09/946,298                                                                                          



                                                      III. CONCLUSION                                                              
                       In summary, the rejection of claim 11 under § 103(a) is affirmed.  The rejection of                         
               claim 12 under § 103(a), however, is reversed.                                                                      


                       "Any arguments or authorities not included in the brief will be refused                                     
               consideration by the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. . . ."  37 C.F.R.                                   
               § 1.192(a).  Accordingly, our affirmance is based only on the arguments made in the                                 
               brief.  Any arguments or authorities omitted therefrom are neither before us nor at issue                           
               but are considered waived.  Cf. In re Watts, 354 F.3d 1362, 1367, 69 USPQ2d 1453,                                   
               1457 (Fed. Cir. 2004) ("[I]t is important that the applicant challenging a decision not be                          
               permitted to raise arguments on appeal that were not presented to the Board.")  No time                             
               for taking any action connected with this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R.                                    
               § 1.136(a).                                                                                                         



















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007