Ex Parte Kennedy et al - Page 2




             Appeal No. 2006-0128                                                                                    
             Application No. 10/003,353                                                                              

             Appellants’ invention relates to mine doors and, more particularly, to providing a                      
             mine door leaf that is relatively lightweight for its size, has substantial torsional rigidity,         
             has substantial resistance to stress, is fire-resistant, and can be economically                        
             fabricated.  As noted on page 1 of the specification, in general, a mine door leaf of the               
             invention comprises                                                                                     
                    a central core of a solidified composition, outer panels on opposite faces                       
                    of the core, the core having a force-transmitting relationship with said                         
                    panels, the panels and filling constituting an integrated stress-resistant                       
                    structure, and one or more hinge components on the leaf.                                         

             Independent claims 1, 38 and 41 are representative of the subject matter on appeal                      
             and a copy of those claims can be found in the “Claim Appendix” attached to appellants’                 
             brief.                                                                                                  


             The prior art references relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed claim                    
             are:                                                                                                    
             Kennedy et al. (Kennedy)  Re 36,853  Sep.  5, 2000                                                      
             Zen      6,481,179  Nov. 19, 2002                                                                       
                                (filed Dec. 14, 2000)                                                                

             Claims 1 through 9, 14 and 31 through 45 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                     
             being unpatentable over Kennedy in view of Zen.                                                         




                                                         2                                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007