Ex Parte Millhollin - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2006-0627                                                                                         
              Application No. 10/263,140                                                                                   

                     chambers containing a buoyant material; and                                                           
                            an inflatable outer chamber having a flexible outer wall surrounding the                       
                     containment bags, so that the containment bags partially fill the outer chamber.                      
                     The examiner has relied on the following references as evidence of obviousness:                       
              Lederman                         4,011,611          Mar. 15, 1977                                            
              Spieldiener et al. (Spieldiener) 4,516,943          May 14, 1985                                             
              Givens                           4,790,784          Dec. 13, 1988                                            
              Wolfe                            5,304,082          Apr. 19, 1994                                            
              Hansen                           2002/0096101 A1    Jul. 25, 2002                                            
              (published U.S. Patent Application)                                                                          
              Cooney                           2 293 357 A        Mar. 27, 1996                                            
              (published UK Patent Application)                                                                            

                     The following rejections have been appealed:                                                          
                     (1) claims 1, 2, 5, 8, 9, 12, 14 and 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                    
              unpatentable over Spieldiener in view of Wolfe and Hansen (Answer, page 3);                                  
                     (2) claims 3 and 10 stand rejected under § 103(a) over the references as recited                      
              in (1) further in view of Cooney (Answer, page 4);                                                           
                     (3) claims 4 and 11 stand rejected under § 103(a) over the references as recited                      
              in (1) further in view of Lederman (id.); and                                                                
                     (4) claims 7 and 13 stand rejected under § 103(a) over the references as recited                      
              in (1) further in view of Givens (id.).                                                                      
                     Based on the totality of the record, including due consideration of appellant’s                       

                                                            2                                                              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007