Appeal No. 2006-0627
Application No. 10/263,140
Appellant argues that nothing in any of the references teaches or suggests a
“chamber within a chamber” design in which the inner chamber contains a buoyant
material (Brief, page 5). Appellant argues that this particular design is critical since, in
the event that the outer chamber fails, the inner containment bags provide sufficient
buoyancy to prevent listing (id.).
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007