Appeal 2006-1849
Application 10/387,139
control system, we find that such a teaching provides additional motivation
for the combination.
In view of the foregoing, we affirm the § 103(a) rejection over
Christians in view of Hipsky.
CONCLUSION
We have affirmed the § 103(a) rejection of claims 1, 4, 9 and 10 over
Christian in view Hipsky.
The Examiner’s decision is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv)(2006).
AFFIRMED
cam
Carlson, Gaskey & Olds PC
400 W. Maple Road
Suite 350
Birmingham, MI 48009
12
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Last modified: November 3, 2007