onecle - legal research

Court Opinions

State Laws

US Code

US Constitution

Ex Parte Seligmann - Page 1

Legal Research Home > Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 2006 > Ex Parte Seligmann - Page 1

Sponsored Links



         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was             
         not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the            
         Board.                                                                     
                                                                                   
                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                    __________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                         
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                    __________                                      
                                Ex parte DOREE DUNCAN                               
                                    __________                                      
                                Appeal No. 2006-3323                                
                             Application No. 10/287,151                             
                                    ___________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                      
                                    ___________                                     
         Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judges.          
         HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                 
              This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the           
         final rejection of claims 1, 3 through 7, all of which are                 
         pending in this application. Claims 2, 8 through 20 have been              
         canceled by Appellant.                                                     
         We reverse.                                                                









Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007