Ex Parte Seligmann - Page 3



         Appeal No. 2006-3323                                                       
         Application No. 10/287,151                                                 
              (iii) sending the time-of-arrival bounds to said mobile               
         communications device.                                                     
                                     References                                     
         The Examiner relies on the following references:                           
         Shyu                         5,428,544    June 27, 1995                    
         Schmier et al.(Schmier)     6,006,159    Dec. 21, 1999                     
         Ran                          6,317,686        Nov. 13, 2001                

           Rejections at Issue                                                      
         A.  Claims 1, 3 and 6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as              
         being anticipated by Schmier.                                              
         B.  Claim 5 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                 
         unpatentable over Schmier.                                                 
         C.  Claim 4 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                 
         unpatentable over the combination of Schmier and Ran.                      
         D.  Claim 7 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                 
         unpatentable over the combination of Schmier and Shyu.                     







                                         3                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007