The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SANJAY RAGHUNATH DESHPANDE, PETER STEVEN
LENK, and MICHAEL JOHN MAYFIELD
____________
Appeal 2006-0016
Application 10/347,536
Technology Center 2100
____________
Decided: June 8, 2007
____________
Before LANCE LEONARD BARRY, HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP, and
ALLEN R. MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judges.
BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE
A Patent Examiner rejected claims 37-48 and 60-65. The Appellants
appealed therefrom under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a). To assist us in deciding their
appeal, we ordered the Appellants to "map[ ] each of the claimed limitations
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013