Appeal 2006-2252
Application 10/397,012
The rejections as presented by the Examiner are as follows:
1. Claims 1 to 31 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being
anticipated by Brodie
2. Claims 1 to 3, 6, 7, 10, 14 to 16, 18, 19, 21 to 23, 25 and 26 are
rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by Murphy.
3. Claims 5, 9, 20 and 27 are rejected under 35 U.S.C § 103(a) as
unpatentable over Murphy in view of Green.
4. Claims 4, 8, 11 to 13, 17, 24 and 28 to 31 are rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as unpatentable over Murphy in view of Brodie.
5. Claims 4, 8, 11 to 13, 17, 24 and 28 to 31 are rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as unpatentable over Green in view of Brodie.1
The Appellants contend that neither Brodie nor Murphy discloses a
Global Positioning System (“GPS”) and that Brodie does not disclose a GPS
having a receiver that receives its own navigation signal such that said signal
can be canceled by using the GPS receiver’s signal processor.
1 The examiner has withdrawn the rejection of claims 1 to 3, 5 to 7, 9, 10,
14 to 16, 18, 19, 21 to 23, 25 and 26, under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as
anticipated by Green (Answer 10).
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013