1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
2 for publication in and is not binding precedent of the Board.
3
4 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
5 ___________
6
7 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
8 AND INTERFERENCES
9 ___________
10
11 Ex parte JON R. STIEBER, THOMAS P. ADAMS, ROBERT L. ZWIEG, and
12 WILLIAM R. KIRKMAN
13 ___________
14
15 Appeal 2006-2607
16 Application 10/004,738
17 Technology Center 3600
18 ___________
19
20 Decided: February 27, 2007
21 ___________
22
23 Before MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, STUART S. LEVY and ANTON W.
23 FETTING, Administrative Patent Judges.
24
25 ANTON W. FETTING, Administrative Patent Judge.
26
27
28 DECISION ON APPEAL
29
30
31 STATEMENT OF CASE
32 This appeal involves claims 2-9 and 15-21, the only claims pending in this
33 application. We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.
34
35 We AFFIRM-IN-PART.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013