Ex Parte Stieber et al - Page 8

             Appeal Number: 2006-2607                                                                               
             Application Number: 10/004,738                                                                         

         1       Watanabe shows an ATM also having both a bank note accepting and                                   
         2   dispensing device and a coin accepting and dispensing device, and explicitly                           
         3   recites that it sorts the contents (col. 1, ll. 45-62).                                                
         4       Watanabe also shows a device to convey bank notes and coins to their                               
         5   respective devices to ensure that coins cannot be received by the bank note                            
         6   accepting and dispensing device and that bank notes cannot be received by the coin                     
         7   accepting and dispensing device (col. 4, ll. 38-49).                                                   
         8       Richardson shows that two different devices may communicate over short                             
         9   ranges wirelessly (col. 2, ll. 3-13).   This is a notoriously old and well known                       
        10   means of communication between devices.                                                                
        11       Richardson shows that the wireless communication may occur over infrared or                        
        12   radio media (col. 2, ll. 3-13), the latter of which may rely on Bluetooth technology                   
        13   in the 2.4 – 2.5 GHz portion of the radio frequency spectrum using hop frequencies                     
        14   (col. 3, l. 58 – col. 4, l. 8).                                                                        
        15       Richardson shows that Bluetooth in particular may be set for 10-100 meters                         
        16   distance apart use (col. 4, ll. 1-8).                                                                  
        17                                                                                                          
        18                                         ANALYSIS                                                         
        19       Claims 2-9 and 15-21 rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as                          
        20                      rendering the claimed subject matter indefinite.                                    
        21       The above facts show that the phrases “for processing notes including sorting,”                    
        22   “for processing coins including sorting,” and “are brought together,” in claim 15                      
        23   would be understood by a person of ordinary skill in the art and would therefore                       


                                                         8                                                          


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013