Ex Parte TIMOFEEV - Page 4

               Appeal 2006-2796                                                                                                        
               Application 09/230,439                                                                                                  

          1    “an ornamental or protective layer”.1  Hence, because the Naka ’951 stair mat is an                                     
          2    ornamental or protective layer, the broadest reasonable interpretation of the                                           
          3    Appellant’s claim term “facing material”, in view of the Appellant’s Specification,                                     
          4    includes the Naka ‘951 stair mat.  Regardless, the Appellant’s claim 18 requires                                        
          5    that the horizontal and vertical fastening members are adapted to, i.e., capable of,                                    
          6    have facing material applied thereon.  The fixing tongues in the Naka ‘951 figures                                      
          7    appear to be capable of having stair facing materials in general affixed to them by a                                   
          8    technique such as adhesive bonding.                                                                                     
          9            The Appellant argues that none of the applied references discloses the                                          
         10    recited relationship between modulus of elasticity E of the resilient material of the                                   
         11    working member and a thickness H of the working member (Reply Br. 6).  The                                              
         12    thickness H of the working member, as disclosed in the Appellant’s Specification,                                       
         13    is the maximum distance from the bottom to the top of the working member, and                                           
         14    equals the sum of the thicknesses of the facing material, fastening member and                                          
         15    adhesive (Spec. 3, 7; figs. 1-3).  Like the Appellant’s resilient material of the                                       
         16    working member, the Naka ‘951 edge cover is elastic (“a flexible synthetic resin, a                                     
         17    flexible rubber, or the like”, col. 2, ll. 29-30).  Hence, the Naka ‘951 edge cover                                     
         18    appears to have a modulus of elasticity comparable to that of the Appellant’s                                           
         19    resilient material of the working member.  Also, like the Appellant’s facing                                            
         20    structure, the Naka ‘951 edge bead cushion is approximately the thickness of the                                        
         21    combined fixing tongue (14, which corresponds to the Appellant’s horizontal                                             
         22    fastening member), adhesive (col. 3, ll. 6-9) and tread mat (12, which corresponds                                      
         23    to the Appellant’s horizontal facing material) (figs. 1, 2, 5).  Consequently, because                                  
         24    Naka ‘951 uses a conventional facing material that appears to be comparable to the                                      
                                                                                                                                       
               1 Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary 410 (G. & C. Merriam 1973).                                                       
                                                                  4                                                                    


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013