Ex Parte Lyons - Page 2

                Appeal 2006-2855                                                                              
                Application 09/774,727                                                                        
                                                                                                             
                                       STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                  
                      Appellant invented a centralized repository for electronically storing                  
                reputation information relating to a user in a database.  The user and/or third               
                parties (e.g., community organizations) can access the database after proper                  
                verification.  Such a centralized format allows the user to transport any                     
                reputation data from one community to another.  The user, however, can                        
                control the dissemination of their reputation information by preventing                       
                access to the user’s reputation information unless the user authorizes                        
                releasing the information.  Claim 1 is illustrative:                                          
                      1.  A reputation authority for electronically storing reputation                        
                information relating to a user comprising:                                                    
                      a database for storing said reputation information;                                     
                      security measures for verifying identities of at least one of said user                 
                and a plurality of community organizations; and                                               
                      a communication system for receiving said reputation information and                    
                transmitting said reputation information to said plurality of community                       
                organizations responsive to an authorization received by said user.                           

                      The Examiner relies on the following prior art references to show                       
                unpatentability:                                                                              
                Coueignoux                US 6,092,197               July 18, 2000                            
                Lang                      US 2002/0046041 A1         Apr. 18, 2002                            
                                                                     (filed May 10, 2001)2                    



                      The Examiner’s rejection is as follows:                                                 

                                                                                                             
                2 The published application claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) from                      
                U.S. provisional application 60/213,638, filed June 23, 2000.                                 
                                                      2                                                       

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013