Ex Parte Lyons - Page 6

                Appeal 2006-2855                                                                              
                Application 09/774,727                                                                        
                                                                                                             
                      Similarly, the claimed invention pertains to a system for enabling                      
                retrieval of information pertaining to a user’s reputation only if the user                   
                consents to releasing such information.  Since both the claimed invention                     
                and Coueignoux pertain to information retrieval, in particular, consent-based                 
                retrieval of information, they are in the same field of endeavor.  For this                   
                reason alone, Coueignoux constitutes analogous art.                                           
                      But even if we assume, without deciding, that Coueignoux is                             
                somehow not in the same field of endeavor, the reference is certainly                         
                reasonably pertinent to the inventor’s problem – namely, providing an                         
                information retrieval system capable of transmitting certain information                      
                pertaining to a user to requesting parties responsive to the user’s                           
                authorization.  "A reference is reasonably pertinent if, even though it may be                
                in a different field from that of the inventor’s endeavor, it is one which,                   
                because of the matter with which it deals, logically would have commended                     
                itself to an inventor’s attention in considering his problem.”  In re Clay, 966               
                F.2d 656, 659, 23 USPQ2d 1058, 1060-61 (Fed. Cir. 1992).  In our view,                        
                Coueignoux’s fundamental teaching of releasing certain information                            
                requested by a sender only upon the user’s consent logically would have                       
                commended itself to the inventor’s attention in considering the problem of                    
                transmitting reputation information responsive to the user’s authorization.                   
                For at least these reasons, Coueignoux constitutes analogous art.                             
                      We also find ample motivation on this record to combine                                 
                Coueignoux’s teachings with Lang.  Although Lang teaches providing                            
                certain security measures (i.e., determining whether the requester is                         
                authorized to access the requested information, enabling only selected                        
                parties to access the information, etc.) (Lang, ¶¶ 0042, 0023-24; Fig. 7, Step                

                                                      6                                                       

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013