onecle

Ex Parte Nikoonahad et al - Page 1

                   The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                             
                            for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                    
                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                       
                                                    ____________                                                          
                                 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                       
                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                           
                                                    ____________                                                          
                          Ex parte MEHRDAD NIKOONAHAD, GUOHENG ZHAO,                                                      
                                                and KALMAN KELE                                                           
                                                    ____________                                                          
                                               Appeal No. 2006-3247                                                       
                                             Application No. 10/345,055                                                   
                                               Technology Center 2800                                                     
                                                    ____________                                                          
                                               Decided: May 17, 2007                                                      
                                                    ____________                                                          
                 Before LANCE LEONARD BARRY, HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP                                                        
                 and MAHSHID D. SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                     
                 BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                      


                                          I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                        
                         A Patent Examiner rejected claims 1-6, 10, 11, 13-17, 19, 20, 22-29,                             
                 31, 32, and 34-41.  The Appellants appeal therefrom under 35 U.S.C.                                      
                  134(a).  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.  6(b).                                                  










Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013