Ex Parte Li - Page 1



                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written           
                       for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                    

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                      
                                            __________                                               
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                        
                                      AND INTERFERENCES                                              
                                            __________                                               
                                           Ex parte JIN LI                                           
                                            __________                                               
                                         Appeal 2007-0436                                            
                                       Application 10/125,620                                        
                                       Technology Center 2100                                        
                                            __________                                               
                                       Decided: April 17, 2007                                       
                                            __________                                               
              Before JAMES D. THOMAS, MAHSHID D. SAADAT, and                                         
              JAY P. LUCAS, Administrative Patent Judges.                                            
              SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                   


                                    STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                            
                    Appellant appeals under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the Examiner’s final             
              rejection of claims 1-2, 4-12, 14-18, 20-24, and 26-28.  Claims 3, 13, 19, and         
              25 have been canceled.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).                   
                    Appellant’s disclosure relates to an automatic display of a popup                
              window containing a message resulting from a combination of values in a                
              plurality of areas of a graphical user interface (GUI).  (Specification 2).  The       





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013