Ex Parte Jacobs et al - Page 4

              Appeal 2007-0539                                                                     
              Application 10/264,026                                                               

              purified Symbiodin[i]um spp. symbiont preparations showed endogenous                 
              levels of PsA, PsB, PsC, [and] PsD” (id. at ¶ 26).                                   
                    Claims 14-16, 18-20, 32-34, and 36-48 are pending, and stand rejected          
              as follows:2                                                                         
              I.  Claim 20 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as anticipated by Mohammadi.3                  
              II.  Claim 20 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Jacobs I.4                  
              III. Claim 42 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Ghisalberti.5               
              IV. Claims 14-16, 18-20, and 37-48 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as                       
                    anticipated by Jacobs II.6                                                     
              V. Claims 33 and 34 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by                       
                    Roussis.7                                                                      

                                                                                                  
              2  The most recent Examiner’s Answer (mailed May 23, 2006) contains what             
              appear to be, at least in part, new or reinstated rejections.  Under 37 C.F.R.       
              § 41.39(b)(1)(2)(2006), Appellants have two options in responding to a new           
              ground of rejection in the Answer: (1) request that prosecution be reopened          
              before the Examiner; or (2) request that the appeal be maintained by filing a        
              reply brief.  Accordingly, Appellants’ Reply Brief, filed July 24, 2006, “in         
              response to the Examiner’s Answer mailed 23 May 2006” (Reply Br. 1), will            
              be treated as a request to maintain the appeal.                                      
                                                                                                  
              3  U.S. Patent 6,217,913 B1 to Mohammadi, issued April 7, 2001.                      
              4  U.S. Patent 4,745,104 to Jacobs et al., issued May 17, 1988.                      
              5  E.L. Ghisalberti, A Tricyclic Diterpene form Eremophila serrulata, 31             
              Phytochemistry 2168 (1992).                                                          
              6  International Application WO 89/01334 by Jacobs et al., published                 
              February 23, 1989.                                                                   

                                                4                                                  

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013