Appeal 2007-0616
Application 10/733,689
VII. CONCLUSION
In summary:
1) The § 102 rejection of claims 13 through 15, 17, and 18 as anticipated by
Ruegg is affirmed;
2) The § 102 rejection of claim 16 as anticipated by Ruegg is reversed;
3) The § 103 rejection of claim 19 as unpatentable over Ruegg is reversed;
4) The § 103 rejection of claims 20 through 23 as unpatentable over Ruegg
is affirmed;
5) The § 103 rejection of claims 13 through 15, 17, 18, and 20 through 23 as
unpatentable over Pravnik and Ruegg is affirmed;
6) The § 103 rejection of claims 16 and 19 as unpatentable over Pravnik and
Ruegg is reversed; and
7) The provisional obviousness-type double patenting rejection of claims 13
through 16 based on claims 5 through 9 of Application 10/718,855 is
affirmed.
Accordingly, the decision of the Examiner is affirmed-in-part.
VIII. TIME PERIOD
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. §1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013