Ex Parte Chasan et al - Page 1



          1    The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written          
          2            for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board                   
          3                                                                                        
          4          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                     
          5                          ____________________                                          
          6                                                                                        
          7               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                       
          8                          AND INTERFERENCES                                             
          9                          ____________________                                          
         10                                                                                        
         11         Ex parte DAVID E. CHASAN and SUNRAY DiFRANCESCO                                
         12                          ____________________                                          
         13                                                                                        
         14                              Appeal 2007-0691                                          
         15                           Application 10/465,423                                       
         16                          Technology Center 1700                                        
         17                          ____________________                                          
         18                                                                                        
         19                                                                                        
         20                           Decided:  June 20, 2007                                      
         21                          ____________________                                          
         22                                                                                        
         23   Before  FRED E. McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge,                        
         24   and TEDDY S. GRON and SALLY C. MEDLEY, Administrative Patent                         
         25   Judges.                                                                              
         26                                                                                        
         27   McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.                                        
         28                                                                                        
         29                          DECISION ON APPEAL                                            
         30                                                                                        
         31         A.  Statement of the case                                                      
         32         This ex parte appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134(a) is from a rejection of           
         33   claims 1, 4-8 and 11-12, the only claims remaining in the application on             
         34   appeal.                                                                              
         35         We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.  6(b).                                   






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013