1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
2 for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board
3
4 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
5 ____________________
6
7 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
8 AND INTERFERENCES
9 ____________________
10
11 Ex parte DAVID E. CHASAN and SUNRAY DiFRANCESCO
12 ____________________
13
14 Appeal 2007-0691
15 Application 10/465,423
16 Technology Center 1700
17 ____________________
18
19
20 Decided: June 20, 2007
21 ____________________
22
23 Before FRED E. McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge,
24 and TEDDY S. GRON and SALLY C. MEDLEY, Administrative Patent
25 Judges.
26
27 McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
28
29 DECISION ON APPEAL
30
31 A. Statement of the case
32 This ex parte appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) is from a rejection of
33 claims 1, 4-8 and 11-12, the only claims remaining in the application on
34 appeal.
35 We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013