Ex Parte White et al - Page 1



                        The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                     
                                for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                             
                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                      
                                                    __________                                                         
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                       
                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                          
                                                    __________                                                         
                              Ex parte GEOFFREY H. WHITE and WEIYUN YU                                                 
                                                    __________                                                         
                                                 Appeal 2007-0850                                                      
                                              Application 10/733,292                                                   
                                             Technology Center 3700                                                    
                                                    __________                                                         
                                              Decided: May 18, 2007                                                    
                                                    __________                                                         
                 Before DEMETRA J. MILLS, ERIC GRIMES, and LORA M. GREEN,                                              
                 Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                         
                 GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                  


                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                        
                        This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 involving claims to a                                  
                 prosthesis for placement in intersecting blood vessels.  The Examiner has                             
                 rejected the claims as anticipated and obvious.  We have jurisdiction under                           
                 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).  We reverse the rejections based on the Cragg patent,                               
                 vacate the rejections based on the Piplani patent, and enter new grounds of                           
                 rejection.                                                                                            






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013