The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte DONAL E. BAKER, CURTIS J. PLUDE, GARY L. MILES,
MARK W. PFEIFFER
__________
Appeal 2007-0939
Application 10/931,274
Technology Center 2800
__________
Decided: April 30, 2007
__________
Before JOSEPH L. DIXON, JEAN R. HOMERE, and
ST. JOHN COURTENAY III, Administrative Patent Judges.
COURTENAY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the
Examiner’s rejection of claims 1-3, 5, 6, 8-11, 13, 14, 16, 17 and 20-23.
Claims 4, 7, 12, 15, 18-19, 24, and 25 have been cancelled.
THE INVENTION
The disclosed invention is directed to a motor controller wherein a
frequency of the motor's operation is utilized to provide a correction
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013