Appeal 2007-1082
Application 10/327,383
1 on Provisional Applications filed (1) 17 December 2001, (2) 21 November
2 2001 and (3) 18 October 2001.
3 In this appeal, appellants have not attempted to antedate Singer or
4 Tenengauzer. Accordingly, for the purpose of this appeal, Singer and
5 Tenengauzer are prior art.
6
7 B. Record on appeal
8 In deciding this appeal, we have considered only the following
9 documents:
10 1. Specification, including original claims.
11 2. Final Rejection entered 30 March 2006
12 3. The Appeal Brief filed 4 October 2006
13 4. The Examiner’s Answer filed 17 October 2006
14 5. Tenengauzer
15 6. Curatolo
16 7. Singer
17 8. PTO bibliographic data sheet for the application on appeal
18 9. Rouhi, The Right Stuff, 18 Chemical and Engineering News
19 26-33 (Feb. 23, 2003), a copy of which appears in the Evidence Appendix of
20 the Appeal Brief.
21 10. Claims 1, 3-4, 7-9, 11, 13-23, 25-26 and 28 on appeal.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013