Ex Parte Dorsel et al - Page 1



                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                          
                                   is not binding precedent of the Board.                                    

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                         Ex parte ANDREAS N. DORSEL, KYLE J. SCHLEIFER,                                      
                  ELECIA C. WHITE, CHARLES S. LADD, and DEBRA A. SILLMAN                                     
                                               ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-1132                                                
                                          Application 10/036,999                                             
                                          Technology Center 1600                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                       Decided: September 18, 2007                                           
                                               ____________                                                  


                Before TONI R. SCHEINER, DONALD E. ADAMS, and ERIC GRIMES,                                   
                Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                

                ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      This appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 involves claims 1-5, 7-11, and 18-                   
                20, the only claims pending in this application.  We have jurisdiction under                 
                35 U.S.C.  6(b).                                                                            




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013