Ex Parte Dorsel et al - Page 3

                Appeal  2007-1132                                                                            
                Application 10/036,999                                                                       
                from a light system which provides the interrogating light of a power which                  
                varies in response to the control signal characteristic;                                     
                      (b) following step (a), scanning the interrogating light across multiple               
                sites on an array package including an addressable array of multiple                         
                biopolymeric features of different moieties, which scanned sites include                     
                multiple features of the array;                                                              
                      (c) detecting signals from respective scanned sites emitted in response                
                to the interrogating light; and                                                              
                      (d) altering the interrogating light power for a first site on the array               
                package during the array scanning using the calibration of step (a), based on                
                location of the first site or on a determination that the emitted signal from                
                the first site will be outside a predetermined range absent the altering;                    
                      wherein the interrogating light power is altered during a row scan of                  
                the interrogating light.                                                                     

                      The Examiner relies on the following prior art references to show                      
                unpatentability:                                                                             
                Lehman    US 5,237,172   Aug. 17, 1993                                                       
                Rava    US 5,874,219   Feb. 23, 1999                                                         
                Bengtsson   US 6,078,390   Jun. 20, 2000                                                     

                      The rejections as presented by the Examiner are as follows:                            
                1.  Claims 1-5 and 18-20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C § 103(a) as                           
                unpatentable over the combination of Bengtsson and Rava.                                     
                2.  Claims 7-11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C § 103(a) as unpatentable over                  
                the combination of Bengtsson, Rava, and Lehman.                                              



                                                     3                                                       

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013