Appeal 2007-1267
Application 09-967617
said gateway station generating a plurality of datagrams from said
television signal and transmitting the multiple datagrams through said
plurality of dynamic links; and
said user terminal receiving the plurality of datagrams from said
infrastructure and reassembling the datagrams into the television signal.
The prior art relied upon by the Examiner in rejecting the claims on
appeal is:
Turcotte US 5,754,139 May 19, 1998
Sklar US 5,990,928 Nov. 23, 1999
Friedman US 6,154,501 Nov. 28, 2000
Lazaris-Brunner US 6,266,329 B1 Jul. 24, 2001
Kikinis US 6,289,389 B1 Sep. 11, 2001
Hassan US 6,301,231 B1 Oct. 9, 2001
Knoblach US 2002/0072361 A1 Jun. 13, 2002
Nouri US 6,484,213 B1 Nov. 19, 2002
Hub. Def. 2. Webster's II New College Dictionary. 1995.
Dynamic. Def. 2. Webster's II New College Dictionary. 1995.
Datagram. Microsoft Press Computer Dictionary, 3rd ed. 1997.
Hub. Microsoft Press Computer Dictionary, 3rd ed. 1997.
Router. Microsoft Press Computer Dictionary, 3rd ed. 1997.
Rejections:
Claims 1-4 and 18-20 stand anticipated under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) over
Sklar (5,990,928).
Claim 5 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over Sklar in view
of Hassan (6,301,231).
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013