Ex Parte Valley et al - Page 1



                       The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is                        
                                    not binding precedent of the Board.                                     

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                              ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                             
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                              ____________                                                  
                        Ex parte GEORGE C. VALLEY, STANISLAV I. IONOV,                                      
                      ANTHONY S. ACAMPORA, and HOSSEIN H. IZADPANAH                                         
                                              ____________                                                  
                                            Appeal 2007-1280                                                
                                          Application 10/894,950                                            
                                         Technology Center 2600                                             
                                              ____________                                                  
                                         Decided: August 29, 2007                                           
                                              ____________                                                  

               Before JAMES D. THOMAS, JOSEPH L. DIXON,                                                     
               and ROBERT E. NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judges.                                           
               THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 


                      This appeal involves claims 1 through 3, 9 through 17, and 19 through                 
               22.  Claims 4 through 8 have been cancelled and the Examiner has indicated                   






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013