Ex Parte Kaushik et al - Page 1



                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                          
                                   is not binding precedent of the Board                                     
                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                          ____________________                                               
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                          ____________________                                               
                                 Ex parte SHIVNANDAN D. KAUSHIK,                                             
                              BRYANT BIGBEE, AND CHRIS NEWBURN                                               
                                          ____________________                                               
                                             Appeal 2007-1541                                                
                                          Application 10/334,6951                                            
                                          Technology Center 2100                                             
                                          ____________________                                               
                                       Decided: September 25, 2007                                           
                                          ____________________                                               
                Before JAMES D. THOMAS, ALLEN R. MACDONALD,                                                  
                and MARC S. HOFF, Administrative Patent Judges.                                              
                HOFF, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  

                                         STATEMENT OF CASE                                                   
                      Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a Final Rejection of                      
                claims 1-20.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).                                   
                      We affirm.                                                                             
                                                                                                            
                1 Application filed December 30, 2002.  The real party in interest is Intel                  
                Corporation.                                                                                 



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013