Ex Parte Kaushik et al - Page 12

                Appeal 2007-1541                                                                             
                Application 10/334,695                                                                       

                                         CONCLUSION OF LAW                                                   
                      We conclude that Appellants have not shown that the Examiner erred                     
                in rejecting claims 1-20.  Claims 1-20 are not patentable.                                   

                                                DECISION                                                     
                      The Examiner’s rejection of claims 1-20 is affirmed.                                   
                      No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with                     
                this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).                               

                                                AFFIRMED                                                     














                KIS                                                                                          

                SCHWEGMAN, LUNDBERG & WOESSNER, P.A.                                                         
                P. O. BOX 2938                                                                               
                MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402                                                                        

                                                     12                                                      

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12

Last modified: September 9, 2013