Ex Parte Brandenberger et al - Page 2

                Appeal 2007-1652                                                                                
                Application 09/776,058                                                                          
                                                                                                               
                                        STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                   
                       Appellants invented a digital camera that enables introducing filtering                  
                effects via software emulation.  In one embodiment, the user can select a                       
                filter from a menu, adjust filter properties, and preview the filtered image.                   
                Filtering the image on the camera itself precludes the need for bulky optical                   
                filters or processing the image on an external computer.1  Claim 1 is                           
                illustrative:                                                                                   
                       1. A digital camera comprising:                                                          
                       an optical lens system providing an optical image;                                       
                       an image sensor sensing simultaneously multi-color pixel data                            
                corresponding to said optical image;                                                            
                       an input device configured to respond to a manual input selecting one                    
                of a plurality of image filters; and                                                            
                       a processor configured to process said pixel data in response to said                    
                selected image filter to provide filtered image data.                                           

                       The Examiner relies on the following prior art references to show                        
                unpatentability:                                                                                
                Kim                        US 6,137,532               Oct. 24, 2000                             
                Safai                      US 6,167,469               Dec. 26, 2000                             
                Shiomi                     US 6,650,361 B1            Nov. 18, 2003                             
                                                                      (filed Dec. 16, 1998)                     
                Anderson                   US 6,683,649 B1            Jan. 27, 2004                             
                                                                      (filed Dec. 31, 1998)                     


                                                                                                               
                1 See generally Specification 4:1-5:21.                                                         

                                                       2                                                        

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013