Appeal 2007-1652
Application 09/776,058
Specification.3 Moreover, the image’s pixel data is processed in accordance
with the selected function and displayed accordingly at least as a preview
image (i.e., filtered image data is provided).
For at least these reasons, we find all limitations of representative
claim 1 fully met by Anderson. Similarly, we find the limitations of claim 8
also fully met since this capability discussed above likewise performs an
adjustment of the properties of the digital visual recording device to include
selected filter effects as claimed.
Kim, too, fully meets representative claim 1. Kim discloses a digital
camera with a selectable color filter device that operates in conjunction with
a color processor 117 such that either color signal C1 from color processor
117 or color signal C2 originating from the color filter device (but not both)
is mixed with luminance signal Y via mixer 120 for video output.
Specifically, when the color filter function is not selected, selector 215
transmits the color data C1 from color processor 117 corresponding to a
received video signal. If the color filter function is selected, however,
selector 215 transmits the color data C2 selected by the user via color
selection key 222. In so doing, color data C1 of the received video signal is
terminated (Kim, col. 3, l. 62 – col. 4, l. 10; Figs. 1 and 2). The user-
selected color signal C2 is then mixed with luminance signal Y (Kim, col. 3,
ll. 39-44).
3 See, e.g., Specification, at 3:15-22 (noting that image processing software
packages can include various selectable filtering effects including, among
other things, image color enhancement and sharpening) (emphasis added);
see also id., at 5:19-21 and 5:28 – 6:2 (noting that filtering effects may
include variations in color intensity).
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013