Ex Parte Hammerstad - Page 5

                Appeal 2007-2241                                                                                   
                Application 09/768,990                                                                             
            1          We observe that Appellant’s understanding of the Examiner’s position                        
            2   is rooted in part in a vague statement made in the Final Rejection that has yet                    
            3   to be clarified.  The Examiner issued an Office action (mailed May 20,                             
            4   2005) rejecting (a) claims 1-8 under 35 U.S.C. §101 and (b) claim 1-16                             
            5   under 35 U.S.C. §103(a) over Alberts in view of Tso. Appellant filed a                             
            6   response (Sep. 26, 2005) including an amendment to claim 1. The                                    
            7   amendment to claim 1 is reproduced below:                                                          
            8          1. A method of delivering content and time significant advertising                          
            9          from a server to a subscriber comprising the steps of:                                      
           10              accepting a subscriber profile including an advertising preference                      
           11          and a time of delivery preference profile;                                                  
           12              storing said subscriber advertising profile at the server;                              
           13              determining an attribute of and a time significance for an                              
           14          advertisement;                                                                              
           15              recalling at the server said stored subscriber advertising preference                   
           16          profile;                                                                                    
           17              comparing said subscriber advertising preference profile to said                        
           18          attribute;                                                                                  
           19              determining a current time of the subscriber;                                           
           20              comparing said current time to said significance; and                                   
           21              including said advertisement with the content at the server when                        
           22          said current time matches said time significance and said subscriber                        
           23          advertising profile matches said attribute ; and                                            
           24                 delivering the content and said included advertisement from the                      
           25          server to the subscriber when said current time determination matches                       
           26          said time of delivery preference.                                                           
           27   The Examiner then issued a Final rejection (mailed Oct. 31, 2005) stating:                         
           28   “The amendment filed on 9/26/05 is sufficient to overcome the prior                                
           29   rejection. A new reference [i.e., Batachia] has been added to the 35 USC 103                       
           30   rejection” (p. 2). The Final rejection (p. 2) then restates the grounds of                         
           31   rejection to read that claims 1-6 and 9-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C.                            
           32   § 103(a) over Alberts in view of Tso in view of Batachia, the rejection now                        


                                                        5                                                          

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013