Ex Parte Chang et al - Page 2

               Appeal 2007-2460                                                                           
               Application 10/709,179                                                                     
                                     STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                
                     Applicants’ (“ASE’s”) invention relates to a method of fabricating                   
               bumps on the backside of a chip.  (Specification, ¶ 3).  ASE states that most              
               electronic products are designed to be as light and compact as possible.  (Id.             
               at ¶ 6).  To facilitate light and compact designs, multi-chip packages have                
               been developed, such as having a plurality of chips stacked on top of each                 
               other and enclosed by a molding compound.  (Id.).  ASE’s specification                     
               states that a method of fabricating bumps on the backside of a chip would                  
               have the potential to reduce the size of a multichip package structure.  (Id. at           
               ¶ 15).                                                                                     
                     There is one independent claim on appeal, claim 15.  ASE states that                 
               claim 15 is representative of the claims on appeal for each of the rejections              
               on appeal.   (Appeal Br. at 4).  Claim 15 is directed to a method of                       
               fabricating bumps on the backside of a chip.  Specifically, claim 15 reads as              
               follows:                                                                                   
                            A method of fabricating bumps on a backside of a chip,                        
                     comprising the steps of:                                                             
                            providing the chip with an active surface having at least a                   
                     bonding pad thereon and the backside;                                                
                            forming at least a bump pad on the backside of the chip;                      
                     and                                                                                  
                            forming a bump on the bump pad.                                               

                     The Examiner made three (3) prior art rejections as follows:                         
                     i)     Claims 15, 16 and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                           
                     102(e) as anticipated by Ono, U.S. Published Application                             
                     2003/0107129 (“Ono”)                                                                 




                                                    2                                                     

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013