onecle

Ex Parte Arlt et al - Page 1



                    The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding                              
                                                precedent of the Board.                                                    

                              UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                    
                                                    __________________                                                     
                                     BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                    
                                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                                        
                                                    __________________                                                     
                           Ex parte JOACHIM ARLT and KARL-HERMANN BUSSE                                                    
                                                    __________________                                                     
                                                  Appeal 2007-2501                                                         
                                               Application 10/026,9171                                                     
                                               Technology Center 2800                                                      
                                                     ________________                                                      
                                                  Decided: August 24, 2007                                                 
                                                     ________________                                                      
                  Before ADRIENE LEPIANE HANLON, RICHARD TORCZON, and                                                      
                  SALLY C. MEDLEY,  Administrative Patent Judges.                                                          
                  MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                     
                                              DECISION ON APPEAL                                                           
             1           A.  Statement of the Case                                                                         
             2           Applicants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of                                 
             3    claims 1-4, 6-9, 11, 12, 14, and 15.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.                               
             4    § 6(b).                                                                                                  


                                                                                                                          
                  1   Application for patent filed 21 December 2001.  The real party in interest                           
                  is VenTec Gesellschaft für Venturekapital und Unternehmensberatung.                                      



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013