Appeal 2007-2593
Application 09/859,359
1 DECISION
2 To summarize, our decision is as follows:
3 • The rejection of claims 1, 4-7, 9-11, 15, 16, 18-21, 23-25, 29, 30, 32-35, 37-
4 46, 48-55, 57-64, and 66-68 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by
5 Sloane is sustained.
6 • The rejection of claims 12-14 and 26-28 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
7 unpatentable over Sloane is sustained.
8 No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal
9 may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
10 AFFIRMED
11
12
13
14 vsh14
15
16 ESTHER H. CHONG, ESQUIRE
17 SYNNESTVEDT & LECHNER LLP
18 2600 ARAMARK TOWER
19 1101 MARKET STREET
20 PHILADELPHIA PA 19107-2950
14
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Last modified: September 9, 2013