Ex Parte Venegas - Page 2

                Appeal 2007-2844                                                                             
                Application 09/829,032                                                                       
                      1.  Support apparatus comprising:                                                      
                            a sign having a hollow, elongated post with a rectangular                        
                      cross section and a plurality of spaced-apart through-holes; and                       
                            a base comprising                                                                
                            a hollow fillable body having a bottom portion adapted to                        
                      rest on a ground surface and a top portion transitioning into a                        
                      collar immediately above the fillable body,                                            
                            the collar including a rectangular bore dimensioned to                           
                      receive the cross section of the post and at least one aperture                        
                      configured to align with one of the spaced-apart through-holes                         
                      of the post when it is received into the collar, and                                   
                            a fastener received by the aperture and through holes to                         
                      hold the sign in an aligned, upright position.                                         
                      The Examiner relies upon the following references:                                     
                      Wilson  US 4,145,044  Mar. 20, 1979                                                    
                      Brault   US 5,220,740  Jun. 22, 1993                                                   
                      Ferrari  US 5,833,556  Nov. 10, 1998                                                   
                      Cragg   US 6,348,028 B1  Feb. 19, 2002                                                 

                      We affirm.                                                                             

                                               DISCUSSION                                                    
                      The Examiner has set forth three grounds of rejection over all of the                  
                claims:                                                                                      
                      1)  Claims 1 and 5-91 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                 
                obvious over the combination of Brault and Ferrari (Answer 4);                               
                      2)  Claims 1 and 5-9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                  
                obvious over the combination of Brault and Wilson (id. at 5); and                            


                                                                                                            
                1 The Answer rejects claims 1 and 5-10 (id. at 4-6), but claim 10 was                        
                canceled (Br. 2, n. 1).                                                                      
                                                     2                                                       

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013