The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KATSUHIKO HIEDA
____________
Appeal 2007-3958
Application 10/611,229
Technology Center 2800
____________
Decided: September 25, 2007
____________
Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, THOMAS A. WALTZ,
and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Statement of the Case
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of
claims 1-12.1 We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6.
1 Claims 13-15 have been withdrawn from consideration (Br. 5).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013