Ex Parte Hieda - Page 6

               Appeal 2007-3958                                                                             
               Application 10/611,229                                                                       
               Appellant has not directed us to a special definition for “tunnel insulating                 
               film” that would distinguish from the silicon oxide layer disclosed by Kim.                  
                      Appellant’s argument regarding the operating principle of the STTM                    
               device of Kim is not persuasive (Br. 13-15).  Kim discloses that the                         
               reference to any x-axis or y-axis is meant to be interpreted in a directional                
               sense only.  Specifically, Kim states:                                                       
                            Reference to a [sic, an] x-axis and a y-axis in conjunction                     
                      with a description of this invention is merely for establishing                       
                      relative direction of various components of the present STTM                          
                      memory cell array for purposes of ease of clarity and                                 
                      comprehension for the reader of this description and not for any                      
                      other purpose. Reference to an x-axis and a y-axis in the                             
                      description of this invention is not to be interpreted as meaning                     
                      that the STTM of this invention actually requires any specific                        
                      x-axis or y-axis relative to any specific physical position on the                    
                      surface of the STTM, but instead is to be interpreted as                              
                      providing only direction, relative configuration and guidance as                      
                      to the various components of the STTM of the present                                  
                      invention.  Accordingly, the reference to any x-axis or y-axis is                     
                      meant to be interpreted in a directional sense only, i.e.,                            
                      horizontal versus vertical relative to a plane, and accordingly,                      
                      the reference thereof in the specification and the claims should                      
                      not be used to purposefully interpret the scope of the claims of                      
                      the present invention as requiring a particular x-axis or y-axis.                     
               (Kim, col. 10, ll. 1-19).  Thus, a person of ordinary skill in the art would                 
               have reasonably expected that a charge could have been supplied from                         
               Kim’s semiconductor substrate through the first dielectric layer (11) to the                 
               first conductive layer (12).                                                                 
                      Appellant has not referred to any secondary evidence to rebut the                     
               prima facie case established by the Examiner.  Accordingly, based on the                     
               factual findings set forth in the Answer and above, we determine that the                    


                                                     6                                                      

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013