The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is
not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KHUY V. NGUYEN,
DOANLD K. SIMMONS, RONALD W. CALL
AND SHAWN E. HUX
____________
Appeal 2007-3962
Application 10/005,846
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: September 11, 2007
____________
Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, CHARLES F. WARREN, and
CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the Examiner’s
decision rejecting claims 1-11. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013