Cite as: 522 U. S. 34 (1997)
Breyer, J., dissenting
statute, would not have intended to preclear earlier, potentially unlawful, local changes of which he had not specifically been told. Rome was one such city. Monroe was another. The District Court consequently concluded that the Attorney General's preclearance of the 1968 statute did not preclear Monroe's earlier change, any more than it did Rome's. I agree with the District Court and would affirm its judgment.
51
Page: Index Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18Last modified: October 4, 2007