Ex parte WILHELM A. KELLER - Page 2




          Appeal No. 95-2880                                                          
          Application 08/091,294                                                      


               This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner refusing           
          to allow claims 1, 2, 4 through 6 and 8 through 17 after                    
          amendment subsequent to the final rejection.  Claims 3 and 7 have           
          been canceled.  No claims have been allowed.                                
               The appellant's invention is directed to a mixer for a                 
          dispensing appliance (claims 1 and 4 through 6), an attachment              
          for a mixer for a dispensing appliance (claims 2 and 8 through              
          10), a mixing apparatus (claims 11 through 14), and an attachment           
          for placement over a dispensing means of a mixing apparatus                 
          (claims 15 through 17).  The subject matter before us on appeal             
          is illustrated by reference to claim 1, which reads as follows:             
               1.  A mixer for a dispensing appliance having a double                 
          cartridge, comprising means for sealing and for rotatably snap-in           
          mounting an attachment at a dispensing end of said mixer, said              
          mounting and sealing means comprising a circular bead provided at           
          a dispensing end of said mixer and a corresponding groove                   
          provided in a mounting end of said attachment, said bead and the            
          external diameter of the dispensing end of said mixer, on one               
          hand, and said groove and the internal diameter of said                     
          attachment, on the other hand, having such dimensions that said             
          attachment is rotatably and sealingly maintained on said mixer.             
                                   THE REFERENCES                                     
               The references relied upon by the examiner to support the              
          final rejection are:                                                        
          Livingstone                   2,715,480           Aug. 16, 1955             
          Reed                          2,815,895           Dec. 10, 1957             
          Yoshioka                      4,241,855           Dec. 30, 1980             
          Colin et al. (Colin)          4,995,540           Feb. 26, 1991             

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007