Ex parte VAN REES - Page 1




                                            THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                                               
                                The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                                                                                   
                                today (1) was not written for publication in a law                                                                                                     
                                journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                                 
                                                                                                Paper No. 16                                                                           

                                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                                               
                                                                          ________________                                                                                             
                                                      BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                                               
                                                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                                                             
                                                                          ________________                                                                                             
                                                              Ex parte NORMAN A. VAN REES                                                                                              
                                                                          ________________                                                                                             
                                                                        Appeal No. 95-0954                                                                                             
                                                                   Application 08/058,0921                                                                                             
                                                                          ________________                                                                                             
                                                                        HEARD: MAY 5, 1998                                                                                             
                                                                          ________________                                                                                             
                     Before GARRIS, WARREN and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                                                    
                     OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                                               


                                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                                             
                                This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of                                                                                               
                     claims 1-16, which are all of the claims in the application.                                                                                                      



                                1Application for patent filed May 6, 1993.  According to                                                                                               
                     appellant, the application is a continuation-in-part of                                                                                                           
                     Application 07/882,272, filed May 13, 1992, now abandoned.                                                                                                        
                                                                                        -1-1                                                                                            





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007