Ex parte VAN REES - Page 11




          Appeal No. 95-0954                                                          
          Application 08/058,092                                                      


          scope and utilization of the invention.  Accordingly, we do                 
          not sustain the rejection of claim 16 under 35 U.S.C. § 112,                
          second paragraph.                                                           




                                      DECISION                                        
               The rejection of claims 1-16 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                  
          being unpatentable over Whistler or Eden, in view of Palinczar              
          is affirmed.  We denominate this affirmance as involving a new              
          ground of rejection under 37 CFR § 1.196(b).  The rejection of              
          claim 16 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, is reversed.              
               This decision contains a new ground of rejection pursuant              
          to 37 CFR § 1.196(b)(amended effective Dec. 1, 1997, by final               
          rule notice, 62 Fed. Reg. 53,131, 53,197 (Oct. 10, 1997), 1203              
          Off. Gaz. Pat. & Trademark Office 63, 122 (Oct. 21, 1997)).                 
          37 CFR § 1.196(b) provides that, “A new ground of rejection                 
          shall not be considered final for purposes of judicial                      
          review.”                                                                    
               37 CFR § 1.196(b) also provides that the appellant,                    
          WITHIN TWO MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE DECISION, must exercise              


                                        -11-11                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007