Ex parte BAUMGART et al. - Page 1




                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for                                                     
                 publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                            
                                                                                                  Paper No. 11                                          

                                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                        
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                         
                                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                                           
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                           Ex parte Chris W. Baumgart and Christopher A. Ciarcia                                                                       
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                                           Appeal No. 95-1217                                                                           
                                                       Application 08/039,6741                                                                          
                          ____________                                                                                                                  

                 Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT, and FLEMING, Administrative Patent                                                                           
                 Judges.                                                                                                                                
                 FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                  


                                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                           
                          This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of                                                                      
                 claims 1 through 13 and claims 15 through 20, all of the                                                                               
                 claims pending in this application.  Claim 14 has been                                                                                 
                 canceled.                                                                                                                              
                          The invention is directed to an automatic target                                                                              
                 recognition apparatus and method.  The invention can be used                                                                           


                          1    Application for patent filed March 30, 1993.                                                                             
                                                                           1                                                                            





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007