Ex parte BAUMGART et al. - Page 5




          Appeal No. 95-1217                                                          
          Application 08/039,674                                                      


               Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellants and the              
          Examiner, reference is made to the brief and answer for the                 
          respective details thereof.                                                 
                                       OPINION                                        
               We will not sustain the rejection of any of the claims.                
          Specifically, we reverse the rejection of claims 1 through 13               
          and                                                                         




          claims 15 through 20 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 1; we reverse                 
          the                                                                         
          rejection of claims 3, 7 through 11, and 17 through 18 under                
          35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 2; and we reverse the rejection of claims 1              
          through 13 and claims 15 through 20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.                  

               1. The rejections under § 112, ¶ 1                                     
               In order to be enabling under 35 U.S.C. § 112, a patent                
          application must sufficiently disclose an invention to enable               
          those skilled in the art to make and use it.  In re Buchner,                
          929 F.2d 660, 661, 18 USPQ2d 1331, 1332 (Fed. Cir. 1991).                   
          "Although not explicitly stated in section 112, to be                       

                                          5                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007