Appeal No. 95-1217
Application 08/039,674
unpatentable over Corwin et al. in view of Fukumizu and
further in view of Crimmins et al. Claims 3 and 17 stand
rejected under § 103 as unpatentable over Corwin et al. in
view of Fukumizu and further in view of Prakash. Claims 4 and
16 stand rejected under § 103 as unpatentable over Corwin et
al. in view of Fukumizu and further in view of Huynh.
Claim 6 stands rejected under § 103 as unpatentable over
Corwin et al. in view of Fukumizu and further in view of
Eckstein, Jr. Claim 9 stands rejected under § 103 as
unpatentable over Corwin et al. in view of Fukumizu and
Crimmins et al. and further in view of Hunt et al. Claim 10
stands rejected under § 103 as unpatentable over Corwin et al.
in view of Fukumizu and Crimmins et al. and further in view of
Huynh et al. Claim 19 stands rejected under § 103 as
unpatentable over Corwin et al. in view of Fukumizu and
further in view of Nakatani. Finally, claim 20 stands
rejected under § 103 as unpatentable over Corwin et al. in
view of Fukumizu and further in view of Hunt et al.
An amendment was filed after the March 21, 1994, Office
Action (final). This amendment was not entered.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007