Ex parte MURAKAMI - Page 5




          Appeal No. 95-3405                                                          
          Application 08/077,505                                                      

          The rejections based on Steeves                                             
          The rejections based on Christopher                                         
               Anticipation is established only when a single prior art               



          reference discloses, either expressly or under the principles of            
          inherency, each and every element of the claimed invention.  In             
          re Spada, 911 F.2d 705, 708, 15 USPQ2d 1655, 1657 (Fed. Cir.                
          1990); RCA Corp. v. Applied Digital Data Sys., Inc., 730 F.2d               
          1440, 1444, 221 USPQ 385, 388 (Fed.Cir. 1984).                              
               Each of independent claims 1, 11, and 12 requires that an              
          emulation program received through an input means is stored in a            
          backup memory means such that it will not be erased when the                
          printer is turned off.  An emulation program is not just any                
          stored data or instructions.  According to the specification, an            
          emulation program is defined as follows (spec. at 1):                       
                    There is known that a so-called emulation program                 
               exists for reading the control codes that are                          
               established for a certain printer and converting the                   
               control codes into differently grouped control codes                   
               established for another printer.                                       
          An emulation program gives a printer the flexibility of being               
          capable of responding to control signals from the host computer             
          which are intended for a different printer.                                 
               The appellant is correct that the examiner erroneously                 
                                          5                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007